Why Quick2Judge  IS BETTER THAN A PAPER SYSTEM.

• People like using electronic devices better than a paper system. Getting judges for your tournament will be easier using Quick2Judge.

• Electronic scoring allows the competitors to view their scoring during a sparring match.  This has been found to increase intensity which leads to more exciting matches for the competitors and the spectators.

• Electronic scoring allows the spectators to view the score in "real time".  The involvement of the spectators is usually higher during the match when they can see the "real time" score. 

• Electronic scoring systems are more ACCURATE than paper systems.  Don't think so?  Then look at the example below!  You will be amazed!

• Easy to use software takes only a few minutes to learn.

• Option to test controllers quickly and easily to ensure all judges controllers are working correctly.

A Sparring Match Using the Traditional Paper System:

We have three judges.  Each Judges score card is shown after each point scored.

Blue clearly kicks Red in the stomach for a point.  Because of the position of the judges, only Judge 1 and Judge 2 score a point for Blue.  Blue should have 1 point, Red 0 points.

                 Judge 1                                     Judge 2                               Judge 3 

Blue                          Red                  Blue             Red                    Blue            Red

   I                                                         I                                             

Blue kicks Red in the stomach for a point.  Again, because of the position of the judges, only Judge 1 and Judge 2 score a point for Blue.  Blue should have 2 points, Red 0 points.

                 Judge 1                                     Judge 2                               Judge 3 

Blue                          Red                  Blue             Red                    Blue            Red

   II                                                        II                                             

Red kicks Blue to the body for a point.  Because of the position of the competitors, only Judge 2 and Judge 3 score a point for Red.  Blue should have 2 points, Red 1 points.

                 Judge 1                                     Judge 2                               Judge 3 

Blue                          Red                  Blue             Red                    Blue            Red

   II                                                        II                    I                                             I

Blue kicks Red to the body for a point.  because of the position of the competitors, only Judge 2 and Judge 3 score a point for Blue.  Blue should have 3 points, Red 1 points.

                 Judge 1                                     Judge 2                               Judge 3 

Blue                          Red                  Blue             Red                    Blue            Red

   II                                                       III                    I                          I                  I

The round is now over and the referee collects the paper scoring sheets from the judges.  In most tournaments, the referee counts only the greatest common score between ALL judges.  So in this particular case, the referee would have a score of Blue:1  and Red:0.

However, in actuality the score should be Blue: 3 and Red:1

In some tournaments, the referee will count the greatest common score between two of the three judges.  In this particular case the referee would have a score of Blue: 2 and Red: 1.  A little closer, but still not the actual score.

Using Quick2Judge, the score would actually be Blue:3 and Red:1.  When using a paper system, you will find Olympic Sparring matches have much lower scores than the number of points actually scored.  In a paper scoring system, the referee is usually looking for a unanimous score from all judges.  Very rarely are points to the body seen by all the judges.  This is usually because of the position of the competitors in relation to the judges.  Don't you think you owe it to your paying competitors to give them the most accurate scoring available.

Home